Utilities weigh conversions to natural gas

Sponsored by

by Andy Patterson and Eric Chung, Ernst & Young

Given looming Environmental Protection Agency mandates, which coal-fired generating units should be shut down early? Does it make financial sense to install environmental and other retrofits on the facilities and keep them running? Should coal plants be converted to natural gas? When are supercritical coal plants no longer sustainable in competitive generation markets?

A few years ago, such questions were nearly unthinkable. Coal--cheap, abundant and homegrown--has been the U.S. power industry's go-to fuel. Nuclear, natural gas, solar and wind generally were too expensive or too impractical to compete with coal. As utilities consider adjusting their generation mix, they should understand and evaluate their options and analyze multiple scenarios.

Rising Coal Costs

Coal supplies nearly half of U.S. electric power generation needs, but factors--most notably the rise of shale gas and abundant natural gas supply--are testing coal's supremacy as the most cost-effective energy source and driving interest in coal-to-gas conversions. First, the cost of mining coal is increasing. The richest, most accessible deposits are nearing depletion, forcing mining companies to dig deeper to access thinner seams. Add in transportation, and the all-in price per ton of bituminous coal has more than doubled during the past decade. These trends are exacerbated by a growing global market for coal and periodic incursions--especially into the Appalachian coals--by European interests. The regulatory landscape suggests further increases in the cost of operating coal plants. New federal regulations designed to limit power plant emissions will continue to require expensive upgrades to keep the oldest, least-efficient subcritical coal plants running. Meanwhile, a primary objective of many state and regional regulatory activities remains to reflect the price of carbon emissions in the cost of coal-fired generation. Most important, new shale gas drilling techniques have unlocked vast reserves in shale rock formations. The price of cleaner-burning natural gas is consistently competitive with coal and often cheaper as a generation fuel source.

Some 175 coal-fired units are expected to retire by 2016, pulling 27 GW of capacity offline, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That compares to 6.5 GW retired during the previous five years. Only 10 of the plants to close are being considered for natural gas conversions. But interest in coal-to-gas conversions is rising. Regulated utilities are obligated to provide cost-effective, reliable electricity while limiting environmental impact. Because converting a coal-fired plant to burn natural gas costs far less than building a new gas-fired plant, coal-to-gas conversions can be the smartest solution. For some utilities, building a new gas plant is the right path. For others, the opportunity to leverage extant water rights, transmission access, staff and other resources makes the conversion highly compelling from a cost standpoint.

Factors to Consider

As utilities consider adding more natural gas to their generation mix, they must:

  • Understand the options. Factors include technical viability of conversion, market uncertainty, changes in regulations, ready availability of natural gas pipeline capacity and the ability to convert existing equipment.
  • Evaluate each option. This ideally would include the development of a driver-based decision model to calculate a plant's gross margin from which it can calculate the net present value of free cash flow and estimate the generation asset value under each option. Utilities also should analyze these critical assets at a portfolio level with the objective of optimizing capital spend across the fleet and not simply asset by asset.
  • Introduce innovative partnering concepts. Component manufacturers, joint development partners, local communities interested in jobs and tax incentives, natural gas pipeline owners and other parties have a vested interest in a natural gas build out. Innovative partnering concepts are a key option for making average projects look extremely lucrative.
  • Conduct scenario-based planning. Sensitivity testing, plus Monte Carlo simulation, scenario analysis or both might help utilities understand how factors such as market or regulatory forces might affect each option. Utilities would be able to leverage a risk-informed perspective in comparing the value associated with coal-to-gas conversion with that associated with early retirement or retrofit for emission controls. This effort would need to pay close attention to natural gas and coal forward price curves.

There is no better time to consider converting aging coal-fired plants to gas. Utilities that seek to maximize value for ratepayers, shareholders and their organizations should adopt a robust, well-structured, risk-informed decision-making process to determine whether coal-to-gas conversion is a viable alternative.

Authors

Andy Patterson is a principal in the power and utilities advisory practice of Ernst & Young.

Eric Chung is a senior manager in the power and utilities advisory practice of Ernst & Young.

The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of Ernst & Young LLP, a client-serving member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited operating in the U.S.

More Electric Light & Power Current Issue Articles
More Electric Light & Power Archives Issue Articles

Sponsored by

CURRENT ARTICLES

AEP-PSO asks for rate hike, cites EPA costs

07/02/2015

If approved, rate hike would add more than $14 to monthly bills

construction Georgia Power Vogtle Unit 4

Vogtle Unit 4 completes major construction milestone

07/01/2015 Georgia Power recently announced a major milestone in the construction of Vogtle Unit 4--the placement of the CA04 module ...
distribution Navigant Research

Annual DC Distribution Network Implementation Revenue Could Reach $5.1 Billion

07/01/2015 A new report from Navigant Research examines the opportunity for direct current (DC) distribution networks in four key mar...
information management AVEVA Frost & Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan lauds AVEVA’s customer-centric growth strategy in the engineering information management solution market

07/01/2015 AVEVA has consistently and effectively balanced short-term performance needs with the company’s long-term vision and aspir...
wind farms Alstom Eletrosul Brazil

Alstom signs turnkey contract with Eletrosul to integrate wind farms in southern Brazil

07/01/2015 Alstom has been awarded a turnkey contract worth approximately €100 million from Eletrosul Centrais Electricas S/A (Eletro...
solar NRG Home Solar Solar Decathlon

NRG Home Solar Partners with Solar Decathlon Team

06/30/2015 NRG Home Solar, a division of NRG Energy Inc. (NYSE: NRG) and one of the country’s leading residential solar companies, ha...
non-hydro renewables AWEA

AWEA applauds White House on 20 percent non-hydro renewables by 2030

06/30/2015 Tom Kiernan, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), released the following statement today regarding the Whit...

ON DEMAND WEBCASTS

Solar + Storage: Capturing Opportunities and Overcoming Challenges

The convergence of solar and energy storage applications is under way. The combined application o...

Storage Enters the Global Stage: What’s the value proposition for your region?

For electricity storage, the events of the last two years have shown that the skepticism around t...

How to deploy mobile forms + devices to speed up field service processes & reporting

Overcoming the pain points associated with any process is much simpler and more cost effective th...

Beyond Integration: Three Dynamics Reshaping Renewables and the Grid

In a unique industry research initiative, DNV GL gathered views from over 1,600 energy sector par...

Engaging the Small and Mid-sized Business (SMB) Marketplace

This session will outline how Duke Energy leveraged Voice of Customer insights, previous experien...

INDUSTRY STOCKS

EL&P BUYER'S GUIDE PRODUCTS

Decontamination & Decommissioning

Decommissioning strategy development, cost estimates, plant modifications; system and building decontamination; RV segmentation; large component re...

Cavitation Peening

AREVA developed its innovative solution for asset management, significantly extending the life of reactor components. Cavitation Peening is a perma...

Nuclear Horizontal Modular Storage (NUHOMS®)

AREVA TN’s NRC-licensed NUHOMS® system ensures the highest safety and lowest dose performance. With no tipping, tripping and sliding, you have the...

ATRIUM™ 11 for BWR Fuel

ATRIUM™ 11 design fuel – in operation since 2012 – provides significantly lower fuel rod power levels for power uprate margins, operational flexib...

POWERGRID PRODUCT LISTINGS

EtherMate® Industrial Ethernet - IO Modules

LioN-M ProfiNet device with 16 digital I/O channels, channels can be used universally as inputs or outputs, M12 socket, ro...

OFL280 FlexTester - Handheld OTDR

AFL's OFL280 FlexTester offers an unmatched combination of fiber test functions, ease-of-use, portability, and value.

ADSS Mini-Span® Fiber Optic Cable

AFL Mini-Span® All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) cable is designed for outside plant aerial and duct applications in l...

TRM® 2.0 - Test Results Manager PC Analysis and Reporting

Test Results Manager 2.0 (TRM® 2.0) is an all-in-one analysis, viewer and reporting tool designed for use with NOYES fiber...

FEATURED ENERGY JOBS

View more Job Listings >>

POWERGRID International

March 2015
Volume 20, Issue 3
1503PG-cover

ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER

January 2015
Volume 93, Issue 1
1501elp-cover