North American Utility Industry Needs Reputation Makeover

Sponsored by

by John Patterson, Reputation Institute

Despite investing billions in smart meters, renewable energy and customer service improvements, utilities still have an average reputation with consumers, a global study shows.

Each January since 2006, Reputation Institute (RI) conducts a study across 34 countries asking the public to rate more than 1,800 companies on the trust, admiration, good feeling and esteem they have for the largest companies in each market.

This Global Reputation Pulse score between zero and 100 is a perception and an emotional response to a company's ability to deliver on seven reputation dimensions: products and services, innovation, workplace, governance, leadership, citizenship and financial performance.

Unlike other intangible assets that companies can control, corporate reputation resides in the hearts and minds of stakeholders: employees, customers, suppliers, regulators, investors, activists and media. Reputation must be earned.

What Drives Global Utility Industry Corporate Reputation?

The global industry mean for Reputation Pulse was 64.2, but the 33 utilities measured in the 2010 study came in at 63.58. That's behind 14 industries, including energy at 64.96, and in front of seven industries, including the world's least reputable industry, tobacco, at 51.24.

Two utilities in the world scored above a 70, the threshold for a "strong" reputation, compared with an "excellent" reputation above 80 and an "average" reputation above 60: Southern Co. at 72.95 and India's NTPC at 71.21.

If consumers in 34 countries find most utilities in the middle when it comes to reputation, which reputation dimensions are most important to them? From a company perspective, knowing which dimensions matter more can indicate which areas of improvement would move the needle most to improve reputation.

The top three reputation drivers for the utility industry are governance, products and services, and citizenship, composing 48 percent of a utility's reputation (see Figure 1).

Utility reputations are influenced equally by how they are run and what they give back to their communities, pushing governance and citizenship into dual prominence as reputation drivers.

The utility industry is one of only four industries of the 25 Reputation Institute studied in 2010 where products and services was not the No. 1 driver for consumers. Governance tied products and services as most important largely because of a lingering Enron effect. Consumers place energy and utility company ethics and transparency on a higher level than industries not tainted by recent scandal.

Each dimension accounts for more than 11 percent of reputation, and the difference between the leading driver–governance at 16.8 percent–and the lowest-rated one–financial performance at 11.5 percent–in 2010 is just more than five percentage points. Compare today's picture with the utility reputation dimension weights in 2007 when TXU was involved in the largest leveraged buyout in history and utilities on both sides of the 49th parallel were operating in a macro environment of strong economic growth and a bullish stock market. Then, citizenship (20.5 percent), products and services (19 percent) and innovation (14 percent) were the top three drivers, followed by governance, workplace, leadership and financial performance.

Building a Strong Utility Reputation via Influence Channels

Corporate reputations are formed when stakeholders experience the company through three possible influence channels:

  1. Direct experience: products, investments, employment, customer service,
  2. What the company says and does: branding, marketing, public relations, social responsibility, and
  3. What others say: media (traditional and social), topic experts, leaders, friends and family.

When one or more of the three influence channels enhances or weakens corporate reputations, a stakeholder changes his or her level of supportive behavior toward the company. RI measures three components of supportive behavior: willingness to recommend the company, to say something positive about the company and to give the company the benefit of the doubt in a crisis.

 

The four U.S. utilities in the study see interplay between their Reputation Pulse scores and supportive behavior. While Southern Co. at 72.95 had a stronger reputation than Constellation Energy Group Inc. at 66.2, Florida Power & Light Co. (FPL) at 64.73 and Exelon Corp. at 61.05, it had a lower recommendation score at 43.2 percent than Constellation Energy at 46.8 percent and FPL at 47 percent. Despite having the third overall reputation in the group, FPL enjoyed the highest benefit of the doubt score at 46.5 percent.

In Canada, Manitoba Hydro at 67.19 and BC Hydro at 66.7 had the strongest reputations with consumers. Hydro Québec at 63.06 and Hydro One at 58.14 trail behind with moderate to weak overall reputations. Manitoba Hydro and BC Hydro's recommend scores, however, were five points behind that of category leader Hydro Québec at 50.6 percent. As for the benefit of the doubt consumers give Canadian utilities, BC Hydro is the top vote getter with 39.6 percent, followed closely by Manitoba Hydro at 37.1 percent and Hydro Québec at 36.5 percent.

At the individual reputation-dimension level, the following North American utilities were rated highest in 2010 by consumers in their respective home countries: Products and services, Southern Co. (73.81) and Hydro Québec (71.77); innovation, Southern Co. (70.63) and Manitoba Hydro (68.44); workplace, tie among Southern Co. (72.88), Constellation Energy (72.86) and Hydro Québec (75.66); governance, Southern Co. (75.32) and Manitoba Hydro (69.12); citizenship, Southern Co. (70.83) and Manitoba Hydro (67.27); leadership, Southern Co. (73.35) and Manitoba Hydro (69.70); and financial performance, Southern Co. (74.81) and Hydro Québec (78.86).

Who's Hot, Who's Not in World Utility Reputation

Outside North America, the 25 largest utilities run the reputation gamut from NTPC's 72.51 in India to E.ON's 52.24 in Germany (see Figure 2). The top 10 global utilities in Reputation Pulse scores are: Southern Co. (U.S., 72.95); NTPC (India, 71.21); Enel (Italy, 69.45); Electrobrás (Brazil, 69.17); Chuba Electric Power (Japan, 68.3); A2A (Italy, 67.6); KEPCO (South Korea, 67.49); Manitoba Hydro (Canada, 67.19); National Grid (U.K., 66.99); and EDF (France, 66.93). The biggest utility reputation gainers between 2009 and 2010 were: RWE (Germany, +7.77); Southern Co. (U.S., +6.62); National Grid (U.K., +6.52); CFE (Mexico, +6.5); Centrica (U.K. +6.33); and E.ON (Germany, +6.24).

The five utilities whose reputations declined in their home countries compared with 2009 were: EDF (France, -7.90); KOGAS (South Korea, -3.86); Scottish and Southern Energy (U.K., -3.28); Cemig (Brazil, -1.89); and Veolia Environnement (France, -1.42).

Only one company–Southern Co. at No. 132–cracks the top 150 in RI's Reputation Pulse Global 600, and only 10 others placed in the top half: No. 175, NTPC; No. 216, Enel; No. 227, Electrobrás; No. 240, Chubu Electric Power; No. 262, A2A; No. 278, Manitoba Hydro; No. 280, National Grid; No. 281, EDF; No. 284, Tokyo Electric Power Co.; No. 299, BC Hydro; and No. 300, GDF Suez.

Conclusion

Morton Albaek of the Danish wind energy company Vestas summed up the gestalt of the new decade best.

"Today, we serve two and only two masters: revenue and reputation," he said. "The trick is to position your brand and build your reputation in the sweet spot between capitalism and humanism."

RI research shows that for every five points a company's reputation improves, supportive behavior increases 6.5 percent. If every North American utility set this as a 2011 key performance indicator and employed a more systematic, integrated approach to dealing with multiple stakeholders, the resulting bottom line and top line performance improvements would drive the business case and prove that a utility's reputation strategy is a sound business strategy.


Author

 

John Patterson is a New York-based senior advisor at Reputation Institute, an advisory and research firm specializing in corporate reputation management that consults companies worldwide. Patterson has worked with clients and written about the global utility industry for the past 15 years at Burson-Marsteller, Ernst & Young, Capgemini and Ketchum. He is an honors graduate of Harvard College. Reach him at jpatterson@reputationinstitute.com.

More Electric Light & Power Current Issue Articles
More Electric Light & Power Archives Issue Articles

Sponsored by

CURRENT ARTICLES

Michigan to comply with EPA rules for power plants

09/01/2015 Michigan will submit a plan by the September 2016 deadline and draft administrative rules for enforcement by 2018 

Utilities, state want solar power amendment off Florida ballot

09/01/2015

The proposed amendment would keep government from regulating small solar power suppliers  

ERCOT expects sufficient generation for upcoming fall and winter

09/01/2015 ERCOT released its final seasonal assessment of resource adequacy for fall and the preliminary outlook for the coming winter

Appalachian Power seeks increase for recovery of transmission costs

09/01/2015 Appalachian has separate proposals for reductions before the SCC that, if approved, result in February 2016 bills that are...

Lower natural gas costs push Duke Energy Florida to ask for lower rates in 2016

09/01/2015 Duke Energy Florida has asked state regulators to let it lower electric rates for 2016, the utility reported Tuesday morning

Exelon-Pepco to keep working on merger approval

08/31/2015

"We will continue working to complete the merger, which all other jurisdictions have approved"

Western states win injunction against ‘Waters of the United States’ rule

08/31/2015

The rule attempts to redefine Waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act 

FEATURED ENERGY JOBS
View more Job Listings >>

INDUSTRY STOCKS

ON DEMAND WEBCASTS

Successfully Integrating Solar: A Proactive Approach

In this complimentary webcast, join DNV GL for a comprehensive look at all aspects of solar grid ...

Horizon Utilities Goes Mobile. Tablets…Then Ongoing Field Feedback Drives Success.

Horizon Utilities of Hamilton, Ontario went from paper to Tablet PCs over a 3 year period with si...

Solar + Storage: Capturing Opportunities and Overcoming Challenges

The convergence of solar and energy storage applications is under way. The combined application o...

Storage Enters the Global Stage: What’s the value proposition for your region?

For electricity storage, the events of the last two years have shown that the skepticism around t...

How to deploy mobile forms + devices to speed up field service processes & reporting

Overcoming the pain points associated with any process is much simpler and more cost effective th...

EL&P BUYER'S GUIDE PRODUCTS

Aurora™

Aurora™ is a proprietary blend of alumino-silicate based minerals engineered to treat a boiler's fireside system against slagging, fouling and corr...

Swage Bus Accessories

By using a compression technology process called "swaging," aluminum bus accessories can be installed without a welder. Products include bus couple...

Decontamination & Decommissioning

Decommissioning strategy development, cost estimates, plant modifications; system and building decontamination; RV segmentation; large component re...

Nuclear Horizontal Modular Storage (NUHOMS®)

AREVA TN’s NRC-licensed NUHOMS® system ensures the highest safety and lowest dose performance. With no tipping, tripping and sliding, you have the...

POWERGRID PRODUCT LISTINGS

Meyer - Engineered Poles

As your comprehensive resource for any configuration of tubular steel structure, Meyer works closely with you to develop e...

LD Poles

The standard designs and high-strength material used in the fabrication of our Light Duty steel poles insures confidence t...

Standard H-Frames

Meyer Steel Structures has compiled a database of existing steel H-frame designs that could be used to quickly meet your n...

Systems & Utility Technology Selection

BRIDGE’s utility business and functional system experts with specific experience in today’s ‘best of breed’ business syste...

POWERGRID International

May 2015
Volume 20, Issue 5
1505pg_C1

ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER

April 2015
Volume 93, Issue 2
1503ELP_C1