Primer on supercritical steam

Sponsored by

Dr. Martin Alf and John Kern
Siemens Power Generation

Thermodynamics govern the ultimate performance of Rankine cycles whether they are used in a coal fired steam power plant or the bottoming cycle of a combined cycle plant. In order to increase the efficiency of those cycles, higher pressure and temperature steam conditions are desired. As a result, many coal fired steam plants being built and planned around the world today utilize "supercritical" steam conditions to achieve higher efficiency. To learn about this subject, EL&P spoke to Dr. Martin Alf and John Kern with Siemens Power Generation.

What is supercritical steam?

When the pressure in a boiler exceeds the "critical" pressure of 3208 psi, water and steam have the same density and no longer exist as separate phase states. Steam conditions above the critical pressure are referred to as "supercritical." Because the water and steam don't have to be separated in a boiler drum, once-through boilers of a Benson or Sulzer design are typically used to generate supercritical steam. These once-through boilers also make it easier to generate steam at higher temperatures, further improving plant efficiency.

What are the benefits when compared to subcritical units?

Typical steam parameters used in sub-critical reheat steam plants are 2400 psi/1000°F/1000°F while modern supercritical units are operating at steam conditions above 3900 psi/1075°F/1110°F. These more advanced steam conditions result in a net plant efficiency of up to 45 percent, which is a 3.5 percent improvement over a subcritical unit. Higher steam conditions yield higher efficiencies, which means that less coal is used to generate the same amount of electricity, compared to a subcritical unit.

Higher plant efficiency also reduces the production of all pollutants by up to 8 percent. This reduction translates into lower emissions of CO2 and mercury, which are difficult to control with current technologies.

How do supercritical steam conditions affect plant design and cost?

Once-through boilers used in supercritical plants have a number of differences from the drum-type boiler typically used in subcritical plants. In a once-through design, water is completely evaporated in a single pass through the boiler rather than re-circulating through the drum. Current designs for once-through boilers use a spiral wound furnace or incorporate vertical tubing with rifled inner surfaces to assure even heat distribution across the tubes. Since once-through systems don't have a drum to concentrate and remove impurities, they usually require a condensate polisher and use oxygenated water chemistry to maintain steam purity. Recent advances in high temperature materials (such as T-91), provide high temperature strength and improved corrosion resistance, permitting reliable operation in advanced steam cycles, thus improving thermal efficiency.

The design of the high-pressure (HP) element on the steam turbine takes into consideration the higher steam forces and higher pressure drop between HP inlet and exhaust. To accommodate this higher pressure, the number of stages in the turbine is increased and the cylinder wall is thickened. Rotor and cylinder components are upgraded to enhanced 10 - 12 percent chrome steels to withstand higher temperatures and pressures. Full-arc admission and simplified inlet features are used to take advantage of the flexibility and efficiency benefits provided by the sliding pressure capability of once-through boilers and to reduce solid particle erosion in the turbine.

While system processes and plant arrangements for balance of plant are basically the same, the higher supercritical pressures use smaller diameter pipes with thicker pipe walls. Additional systems such as the condensate polisher are required, but all of the coal handling and emissions control equipment can be sized smaller due to increased plant efficiency.

Because total plant costs vary considerably depending on project scope and specifications, it is difficult to make a direct comparison between sub- and supercritical capital costs. Most sources indicate that for a comparably sized plant, the EPC cost for a supercritical unit will be 2 - 5 percent higher.

How does the operation of a supercritical plant differ from a subcritical plant?

Operational differences stem mainly from the dissimilarity between a once-through boiler and a drum-type boiler. The drum boiler holds a greater stored water/steam volume, which allows larger load step-changes that can be helpful for operation on weak transmission grids. For ramping changes over large load ranges, as required for cycling operation, the once-through boiler is significantly faster due to its thinner walled components and smaller storage capacity. These design characteristics also allow supercritical plants to have a shorter start-up time. When combined with the sliding pressure capability of modern steam turbines, supercritical plants offer a higher degree of operational flexibility and reduced load efficiency than subcritical units equipped with a drum type boiler.

Operation and maintenance costs are about the same for the two designs. Supercritical units will have added costs for the condensate polisher and more sophisticated maintenance requirements, but will have lower costs for consumables such as limestone, ammonia and fuel due to higher efficiency levels.

How have recent supercritical plants performed?

Performance problems that plagued the second-generation supercritical plants that went into operation in the 1960s and 1970s have been largely resolved. These issues have not been seen on the third generation plants that have gone into service over the past 15 years. Evaluations of the availability and reliability of comparably sized sub- and supercritical power plants over the past 10 years using databases from NERC and the European agencies show no significant differences in performance between the two plant types.

What "factors" might impact the choice?

The choice between sub- and supercritical technology needs to be made early in the plant design phase and can be influenced by a number of site and operational considerations. The lower operating costs that directly result from higher efficiency supercritical steam cycles can be a strong influence if delivered fuel prices are above average or if the plant has to compete on "spark-spread" with other coal plants. In both cases, slightly higher supercritical capital costs will be justified by the more favorable operating costs.

In addition, if the plant has to compete in a market that might require cycling or reduced load operation, units with once-through boilers have a clear advantage.

The most important factor might be the potential for easier environmental permitting with a supercritical unit. Higher efficiency translates into reduced environmental impact. Less coal and water are used, smaller volumes of fly ash and scrubber waste is produced, and uncontrolled emissions of CO2 and mercury will be lowered. Exactly how environmental agencies will view this benefit is uncertain, but it is expected to become an increasingly important part of an effective permitting strategy.

Alf is the project manager for steam power plants in Erlangen, Germany. Kern is the director of steam turbine and steam plant marketing in Orlando, Florida. Siemens Power Generation's supercritical technology has achieved record efficiency levels of over 48 percent.

Sponsored by

CURRENT ARTICLES

information management AVEVA Frost & Sullivan

Frost & Sullivan lauds AVEVA’s customer-centric growth strategy in the engineering information management solution market

07/01/2015 AVEVA has consistently and effectively balanced short-term performance needs with the company’s long-term vision and aspir...
wind farms Alstom Eletrosul Brazil

Alstom signs turnkey contract with Eletrosul to integrate wind farms in southern Brazil

07/01/2015 Alstom has been awarded a turnkey contract worth approximately €100 million from Eletrosul Centrais Electricas S/A (Eletro...
solar NRG Home Solar Solar Decathlon

NRG Home Solar Partners with Solar Decathlon Team

06/30/2015 NRG Home Solar, a division of NRG Energy Inc. (NYSE: NRG) and one of the country’s leading residential solar companies, ha...
non-hydro renewables AWEA

AWEA applauds White House on 20 percent non-hydro renewables by 2030

06/30/2015 Tom Kiernan, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), released the following statement today regarding the Whit...
India NIWE Wind Vortex

Vortex’s wind forecasting tool to be deployed in India

06/30/2015 Wind modeling specialist Vortex has partnered with India’s National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) to enhance wind foreca...
substation ABB Qatar Saudi Arabia

ABB wins $85 million order in Qatar

06/30/2015 ABB won an order worth around $85 million to provide turnkey substations to help integrate electricity from a new independ...

Justices rule against EPA power plant mercury limits

06/29/2015

The Supreme Court says that the EPA overreached.

ON DEMAND WEBCASTS

Solar + Storage: Capturing Opportunities and Overcoming Challenges

The convergence of solar and energy storage applications is under way. The combined application o...

Storage Enters the Global Stage: What’s the value proposition for your region?

For electricity storage, the events of the last two years have shown that the skepticism around t...

How to deploy mobile forms + devices to speed up field service processes & reporting

Overcoming the pain points associated with any process is much simpler and more cost effective th...

Beyond Integration: Three Dynamics Reshaping Renewables and the Grid

In a unique industry research initiative, DNV GL gathered views from over 1,600 energy sector par...

Engaging the Small and Mid-sized Business (SMB) Marketplace

This session will outline how Duke Energy leveraged Voice of Customer insights, previous experien...

INDUSTRY STOCKS

EL&P BUYER'S GUIDE PRODUCTS

Decontamination & Decommissioning

Decommissioning strategy development, cost estimates, plant modifications; system and building decontamination; RV segmentation; large component re...

Cavitation Peening

AREVA developed its innovative solution for asset management, significantly extending the life of reactor components. Cavitation Peening is a perma...

Nuclear Horizontal Modular Storage (NUHOMS®)

AREVA TN’s NRC-licensed NUHOMS® system ensures the highest safety and lowest dose performance. With no tipping, tripping and sliding, you have the...

ATRIUM™ 11 for BWR Fuel

ATRIUM™ 11 design fuel – in operation since 2012 – provides significantly lower fuel rod power levels for power uprate margins, operational flexib...

POWERGRID PRODUCT LISTINGS

EtherMate® Industrial Ethernet - IO Modules

LioN-M ProfiNet device with 16 digital I/O channels, channels can be used universally as inputs or outputs, M12 socket, ro...

OFL280 FlexTester - Handheld OTDR

AFL's OFL280 FlexTester offers an unmatched combination of fiber test functions, ease-of-use, portability, and value.

ADSS Mini-Span® Fiber Optic Cable

AFL Mini-Span® All-Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) cable is designed for outside plant aerial and duct applications in l...

TRM® 2.0 - Test Results Manager PC Analysis and Reporting

Test Results Manager 2.0 (TRM® 2.0) is an all-in-one analysis, viewer and reporting tool designed for use with NOYES fiber...

FEATURED ENERGY JOBS

View more Job Listings >>

POWERGRID International

March 2015
Volume 20, Issue 3
1503PG-cover

ELECTRIC LIGHT & POWER

January 2015
Volume 93, Issue 1
1501elp-cover